International Mac Podcast

Blog RSS Subscribe by email

Choosing a Task Management System

Posted on Thursday, November 26, 2009 by Will
1 comment

This series was started when David Allen’s system, Getting Things Done, was all the rage. I was somewhat fascinated by it, and the name doubled, and continues to double, as a collective name for any way to organize tasks. However, this is not the only way to accomplish organization, and not the best for many people. There are several different ones out there, and you can pick the one you like best, or make your own.

Getting Things Done

The original one, the one that can be seen as starting it all, is GTD, conceived by David Allen in a book of the same name. GTD has several key principles, which can be boiled down to micromanaging your life—if you want to see it that way. It really would take too long to describe it fully, and since I already have a series going, you can take a look at my previous posts about it.

The Pomodoro Technique

This is one of the newer models I’ve come across, but it’s been around since 1992. It centers around the idea of a measure of time—one Pomodoro—in which you are working on a large task. Once that time is up, you take a break, then return to your task. Repeat this, with breaks of increasing length, until the task is done, then take a break before starting a new task.

The handy organizational chart allows you to write all the tasks you need to do, in order of priority, then make a check for every pomodoro you spend working on it. You can get more complicated, logging each distraction and whether it came from outside sources or yourself.

In its purest form, following the Pomodoro technique is highly disciplined, with rules about what you’re allowed to do on break, voiding an interrupted pomodoro, what you can do when you finish a task in the middle of a pomodoro, and reviewing your logs to see how you can improve. All this and more can be found at pomodorotechnique.com in their instructional PDF.

Pomodoro, by the way, is Italian for tomato, the shape of the kitchen timer in Italy that inspired the system.

Autofocus

This newer strategy takes the guise of a procedure. You need a piece of lined paper or notebook, or an electronic equivalent. You first create the “Backlog” with everything you have to do. When you’ve put down everything you can think of, draw a line separating this from the Active List. You always add tasks you think of to the end of your Active List. Start doing the things on the backlist one by one, skip anything you don’t want to or can’t do, and cross off anything you finish. (It might be helpful to integrate the time management portion of another system.) Once you go through the Backlist once, turn around without proceeding into the Active List and keep going. Only when you’ve made a pass through the backlog without doing anything are you allowed to move on to the active list.

Repeat this until you make a first pass through the backlog (right after passing through the active list) without completing or canceling anything. Once that’s done, draw a line at the end of your Active List, turning it into the Backlog. Your old backlog is now up for review. After continuing down your new backlog until you make a pass without completing anything, return to your Review list. At this point, cross off tasks you aren’t going to complete, and re-add the rest at the bottom of the active list. Think whether you need to reword the task to make it more likely to get done.

This is the idea of Autofocus 1. The creator has come out with several alternatives, and you can take your pick.

(10+2)*5

This is the opposite of Autofocus – a time management strategy without task management. The idea is simple – you take 10 minutes of your task, then take a 2-minute break. Repeat. (The times five is to make it add up to an hour, and to make the name a little less mundane. Or to make you work longer.) It was either developed or stolen by Merlin Mann (probably the former).

Roll your own

This is what the majority of people would probably benefit most from. Combine any of these or other strategies that work for you, but remember to stay on them. I’m not so good with that—I just mentally switched to combining Autofocus with (10+2)*5, and even though I haven’t written a backlist, I’m probably going to end up not doing my current system for at least the rest of the week.

Then again, I just had an idea to keep a list on the chalkboard beside me, and combine that with Autofocus and (10+2)*5. There’s an old saying: Do as I say, not what I do.

Software!

I wouldn’t be me if I couldn’t recommend some software you can use to help you keep on track. For time management, I’ve already suggested The Hit List, and you could use any similar system that you could adapt. What I’m actually trying to get at are timers. At first, I found this (10+2)*5 timer, but it requires Yahoo Widgets, which are pretty clunky and way too much for just a timer. Then I stumbled across Focus Booster It’s an Adobe AIR timer that was designed around similar ideas as the Pomodoro Technique, excepting the increase in break times. It counts down working time, then counts down break time. You can stop a timer, but you can’t start over—you have to go to your next break/work session. This same rule is present in the two time management strategies. The only downside to FocusBooster is that you have to change its defaults (of 25 and 5 minutes for work and break respectively) every time you open the app.

Paper

You might notice that most of these systems suggest paper, but mention that they can be adapted for electronic use. Ever wonder why the professionals use paper? It’s more motivational. Having a tangible list makes it seem more important to your brain, so it’s more likely to get done. Experiment with that if you feel you need to get more done.





One Response to “Choosing a Task Management System”

  1. Joel Drapper Says:

    Really great post, Will. However, I have to say it doesn’t really match the title as it’s not about Task Management at all, it’s about getting stuff done, and systems you can use to accomplish that.

    Regarding task management, and software, having tried OmniFocus, The Hit List, iGTD, Things, and a few other simpler apps, I came to the conclusion that they’re all great, but you have to find the one app that SUITS YOU best.

    For me it was Things because it was the only app that I actually found myself consistently, naturally going to to see what I had to do next. I think the reason for that was the simple organisation method implemented in Things. A task either has to be done today, next, at a certain point in the future (when it would move into my today list), before a certain point in the future, or some day.

    Before that, I used OmniFocus which I really liked, but it was too structured, and yet too unstructured. I never knew what I had to do today.

    Things doesn’t have multi-level tasks (apart from one extra level through projects), which I think is good in a way for a personal task manager because it keeps it simple.

    In your post you only mention, The Hit List, as a task manager, while the title gives the impression this will be about choosing a task management system.

    I’d recommend that everyone trying to choose a task management system checks out at least OmniFocus, Things, The Hit List, and pen and paper before deciding which system they want to use.

    Back to systems for getting stuff done, again, this outlines all the different systems really well. I choose to use a unique “roll your own” system. This involves storing all of my tasks in Things, and planning what things I need to do tomorrow at the end of the day with Things’ “Today” list.

    When it comes to doing these things, I’ll often just see what needs to be done, do it, and get on, but sometimes I need a little more then that, so I launch FocusBooster, and use the default 25, 5 settings. If I finish the task before 25 minutes is up, I’ll just stop the timer, and take a five minute brake. If not, I’ll either move on to another task, or continue working on that task after my brake for another 25 minutes.

Leave a Reply